• 中国计算机学会会刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中文核心期刊

计算机工程与科学

• • 上一篇    下一篇

一种用于阿尔茨海默病诊断的多脑图谱分形特征融合的分类框架

孙思翔,崔灿, 王闯, 李东艳, 刘君利   

  1. (1. 大连交通大学轨道智能工程学院,辽宁 大连  116028)
    (2. 辽宁省卫生健康服务中心,辽宁 沈阳  110005)

A Classification Framework using Fused Fractal Features from Multiple Atlases for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis

SUN Sixiang, CUI Can, WANG Chuang, LI Dongyan, LIU Junli   

  1. (1. School of Railway Intelligent Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)
    (2. Liaoning Provincial Health Service Center, Shenyang 110005, China)

摘要: 现有研究多基于AAL90脑图谱构建阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer’s Disease,AD)患者的低分辨率功能脑网络,以分析AD对其拓扑结构的影响。然而,高分辨率脑网络能够更精确地检测出AD对大脑造成的细微变化,且使用单一分辨率脑网络诊断AD准确率较低。因此,基于BN246、AAL625和AAL1024脑图谱构建了认知正常者(cognitively normal,CN)和AD患者的三种分辨率脑网络,并分析其分形特征。同时,提出了一种多脑图谱分形特征融合的AD分类框架,通过融合三种脑图谱的分形属性,构建了多脑图谱融合连接比例(multi-atlas fused connection ratio,MAFCR)和多脑图谱融合分形维数(multi-atlas fused fractal dimension,MAFFD)两种新特征向量。实验结果显示,CN和AD的三种分辨率脑网络均呈现出分形特征,且两者的分形维数和平均连接比例存在差异。与单一分辨率脑网络的平均连接比例相比,MAFCR诊断AD的准确率高达84.74%,F1分数达到84.53%,分别提升约18%和16%。此外,MAFCR的准确率和F1分数分别比多脑图谱融合的平均度、聚类系数、特征路径长度高约12%和13%。

关键词: 分形特征, 连接比例, 脑网络, 机器学习, 疾病诊断

Abstract: Most existing studies construct low-resolution functional brain networks for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using the AAL90 atlas to examine its impact on network topology. However, high-resolution brain networks can more accurately capture subtle alterations caused by AD. In contrast, classification based on a single-resolution network often results in lower diagnostic accuracy. To address this limitation, we constructed brain networks at three resolutions (BN246, AAL625, and AAL1024) for cognitively normal (CN) individuals and patients with AD, and analyzed their fractal features. Meanwhile, we developed a classification framework for AD that fuses fractal features from multiple brain atlases. By fusing the fractal properties of networks constructed from the three atlases, we derived two novel feature vectors: the multi-atlas fused connection ratio (MAFCR) and the multi-atlas fused fractal dimension (MAFFD). Experimental results showed that brain networks at all three resolutions exhibited fractal properties in both CN and AD groups, with marked differences in fractal dimension and average connection ratio between them. Compared to the average connection ratio from single-resolution networks, the MAFCR achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 84.74% and an F1 score of 84.53%, representing improvements of approximately 18% and 16%, respectively. Furthermore, the MAFCR outperformed multi-atlas fused topological features such as average degree, clustering coefficient, and characteristic path length by approximately 12% in accuracy and 13% in F1 score.

Key words: fractal feature, connection ratio, brain network, machine learning, disease diagnosis