网络系统可生存能力量化评估的指标体系研究

J4 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (06): 1050-1056.

网络系统可生存能力量化评估的指标体系研究

王鹏飞，赵文涛，张帆，邹荣念

（国防科学技术大学计算机学院，湖南长沙 410073）

收稿日期:2012-11-05 修回日期:2013-05-02 出版日期:2014-06-25 发布日期:2014-06-25

Research on index system of quantitative
evaluation for network systems viability

WANG Pengfei,ZHAO Wentao,ZHANG Fan,ZOU Rongnian

(College of Computer,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China)

Received:2012-11-05 Revised:2013-05-02 Online:2014-06-25 Published:2014-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在网络系统可生存性的四个关键属性基础上，采用层次化分析方法，将网络系统自上而下分成软件、硬件及运行环境三个影响因素层，提出了一套可提取、可观测、可操作的指标体系，并通过适当的算法进行量化计算，对结果进行分级评估分析，能在量化评估结果中反映网络可生存属性。通过实验验证，该指标体系使网络系统可生存能力量化评估更可行，使评估结果更有工程指导意义。

关键词: 网络系统可生存能力, 量化评估, 指标体系

Abstract:

On the basis of four key attributes of the network system viability, analytical hierarchy process is used to divide the network system from top to bottom into three factor layers of software, hardware and running environment, and a set of extractable, observable and maneuverable index system is proposed. A proper algorithm is applied to perform quantitative calculation, and the results are analyzed by a graded evaluation，which can clearly reflect the key attributes of the network system viability. Verified by experiment, the proposed index system of network system viability quantitative evaluation is more feasible, which makes the evaluation results more significant to the guidance of engineering.

Key words: network system viability;quantitative evaluation;index system

王鹏飞，赵文涛，张帆，邹荣念. 网络系统可生存能力量化评估的指标体系研究[J]. J4, 2014, 36(06): 1050-1056.

WANG Pengfei,ZHAO Wentao,ZHANG Fan,ZOU Rongnian. Research on index system of quantitative
evaluation for network systems viability [J]. J4, 2014, 36(06): 1050-1056.

参考文献

［1］Hollway A, Neuman G. Survivable computer communication systems:The problem and working group recommendations［R］. Washington:US Army Research Laboratory, 1993.
［2］Wang Zhigang, Yang Shisong. Information network system survivability evaluation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation［J］. Network Security Technology & Application, 2010(10):5860.(in Chinese)
［3］Yang Hua, Lu Xinghua, Liu Yun. Survivability analysis of survivable network info system［J］. Microcomputer Information, 2009,25(13):141143.(in Chinese)
［4］Zhang Yi, Huo Shanshan. Quantitative assessment of survivability of network storage systems［J］. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology),2009,49(S2):21192125.(in Chinese)
［5］Wang Jian, Wang Huiqiang, Zhao Guosheng. Index system of quantitative evaluation for information systems survivability［J］. Computer Engineering, 2009,35(3):5456.(in Chinese)
［6］Bo Bin.Network system framework of survivability and quantitative evaluation of network survivability［D］. Chengdu:College of Electronic Technology, 2010.(in Chinese)
［7］Kant L, Chen W. Service survivability in wireless networks via multi—layer selfhealing［C］∥Proc of 2005 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference,2005:24462452.
［8］Wang H Q, Liu D X, Xu D, et al.A holistic approach to survivable distributed information system for critical applications［C］∥Proc of ISPA’2005,2005:713724.
［9］Lin Chuang,Peng Xuehai.Research on trustworthy networks［J］. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2005,28(5):751758.(in Chinese)
［10］Huang Zunguo, Lu Xicheng, Hu Huaping. The survivability technique and its implementation case study［J］. Journal of China Institute of Communications, 2004,25(7):137145.(in Chinese)
［11］Cai Junping, Xiao Zhiting, Li Xuedong. Survivability evaluation of military information networks based on cloud model［J］. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2010,32(20):1115.(in Chinese)
［12］Liang Xiao, Meng Xiangru, Zhuang Xuchun, et al. Strategy selection model for network survivability based on stochastic game［J］. Journal of Computer Applications, 2012,32(9):26092612.(in Chinese)
［13］Wu Lianggang, Gao Yang, Zhang Jinlong. Research for methods determining the weights of case characteristics［J］. Systems EngineeringTheory &Practice, 2000(10):8992.(in Chinese)
附中文参考文献:
［2］王志刚, 杨世松. 基于模糊综合评价的信息网络系统可生存性评估［J］. 网络安全技术与应用, 2010(10):5860.
［3］杨桦, 卢兴华, 刘云. 生存性网络信息系统生存能力分析［J］. 微计算机信息, 2009,25(13):141143.
［4］张益, 霍珊珊. 网络存储系统可生存性量化评估［J］. 清华大学学报, 2009,49(S2):21192125.
［5］王健, 王慧强, 赵国生. 信息系统可生存性定量评估的指标体系［J］. 计算机工程, 2009,35(3):5456.
［6］柏彬. 可生存性网络系统框架及网络可生存性量化评估［D］. 成都:电子科技大学, 2010.
［9］林闯, 彭雪海.可信网络研究［J］.计算机学报,2005,28(5):751758.
［10］黄遵国,卢锡城,胡华平.生存能力技术及其实现案例研究［J］.通信学报,2004,25(7):137145.
［11］蔡均平, 肖治庭, 李雪冬. 基于云模型的军事信息网络可生存性评估［J］. 武汉理工大学学报, 2010,32(20):1115.
［12］梁霄, 孟相如, 庄绪春等. 基于随机博弈的网络可生存性策略选择模型［J］. 计算机应用, 2012,32(9):26092612.
［13］吴良刚, 高阳, 张金隆. 确定事例特征权值的方法研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2000(10):8992.

[1]	李彤彤, 王诗蕊, 张耀方, 王佰玲, 王子博, 刘红日, . 面向工控系统漏洞的多维属性评估[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2023, 45(02): 261-268.
[2]	王克克, 郭莉丽, 郎静宏 . 基于STAMP模型的风险评估行为安全指标体系[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2022, 44(08): 1372-1381.
[3]	马永军，陈海山. 基于LSTM模型的食品安全网络舆情预警研究[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2019, 41(09): 1603-1611.
[4]	吴果，陈雷，司志刚，白利芳. 网络安全态势评估指标体系优化模型研究[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2017, 39(05): 861-869.
[5]	张所娟，张睿，廖湘林，程恺. 军队院校教师能力发展绩效评估研究[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2016, 38(增刊): 305-308.
[6]	潘茜，张育平，陈海燕. 模糊数学与中介真值理论相结合的评价方法[J]. J4, 2015, 37(09): 1676-1681.
[7]	唐莹，张育平，陈海燕. 一种基于熵理论和中介真值度量的综合评价法[J]. J4, 2015, 37(05): 946-950.
[8]	张恒巍，韩继红，张健，王晋东，寇广. 基于筛选进化模型的指标体系建立方法[J]. J4, 2015, 37(05): 979-985.
[9]	贺章擎1,2,戴葵2,童元满3,邹雪城2. 计时攻击漏洞识别与防护能力量化评估技术[J]. J4, 2014, 36(04): 639-643.
[10]	刘裕1，周毅书2，王明哲1. 基于SOA建模仿真的云迁移适合度测评方法[J]. J4, 2013, 35(11): 139-145.
[11]	黎筱彦1,2，王清贤1，杨林2，朱云3. 基于攻击的局域网安全性度量方法[J]. J4, 2012, 34(11): 38-45.
[12]	谷震离. 基于改进熵值法的MCAI软件评价模型研究[J]. J4, 2010, 32(7): 134-136.
[13]	刘宇潘彤. 办公软件测评指标体系研究[J]. J4, 2007, 29(12): 127-129.
[14]	董剑利[1] 时宁国[2]. 基于软件质量评估的模糊综合评判算法研究与改进[J]. J4, 2007, 29(1): 66-69.